Responses to ash tree comments and questions
Several Norwich residents have responded to recent listserve posts from the Emerald Ash Borer Management Subcommittee (EABMS), and we would like to respectfully offer some clarifications. Our group continues to believe strongly that warrant article 10, which would authorize a town appropriation of $100,000 for removal of hazardous ash trees along our roadways in 2025, represents a responsible and vital community action to begin minimizing public safety risks from EAB.
First, to be clear, the article targets *only* roadside trees within the town right-of-way (25 feet on either side of the centerline), as these pose by far the greatest risk to public safety, mainly to pedestrians, vehicles and bicyclists using our roads. Other EAB-infested ash trees either will be left to die and fall on their own, or will be the responsibility of individual property owners.
Second, the professional experts and technical sources we have extensively consulted predict that >99% of white, green and black ash in Vermont and elsewhere within the range of these three species will die from EAB. Removing hazardous roadside trees is highly unlikely to eliminate enough EAB-resistant individuals to impact the overall numbers of ash that will survive the infestation.
Third, the surplus town funds that the Selectboard has approved in article 10 are not taking away from essential town services that might otherwise be funded in the forthcoming Norwich budget. Our understanding is that hiring another full-time police officer has been hampered only by a lack of qualified applicants.
Fourth, ash is a fine species for firewood. Within the Norwich area, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources recommends limiting any transportation of ash to less than 25 miles, and only within Vermont. Additional firewood information and links are available from the Vermont Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation. The EABMS is hoping to make wood from roadside cutting available to residents.
Fifth, we disagree that our outreach has used "over-the-top" "hyperboles" to depict the gravity of Norwich's EAB infestation. We maintain without reservation that our town does indeed face a serious public safety risk from the inevitable death and collapse of nearly all roadside ash trees. Funding the 2025 removal of those deemed most hazardous seems a small price to pay to minimize risks to the safety of fellow townspeople and others using our roadways.
Finally, some will have observed that a precarious, EAB-infested ash tree was removed from 17 Elm Street on February 6. Due to the high volume of pedestrian traffic passing directly under this tree (including schoolchildren twice daily on foot or bikes), as well as many vehicles and bicycles, we recommended to the Selectboard that it be removed immediately. Following a competitive bidding process and landowner approval, Longto Tree Services from Bradford conducted the removal efficiently and cost-effectively, with minimal disturbance to the site. For anyone interested, photos of the removal process (which took place during a snowstorm) and the tidy aftermath can be viewed on the Norwich Conservation Commission website.
Also on the Norwich Conservation Commission website are photos and detailed captions illustrating two examples of green ash trees doomed by EAB; both trees can be observed behind Ledyard Bank.
We sincerely thank our many fellow townspeople who have expressed interest in and provided feedback on this issue. We hope for an affirmative vote Tuesday on article 10.
View the original post on Vital Communities